Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

The impact of viral news on journalism ethics

In the age of social media and instant news dissemination, the impact of viral stories on journalism ethics cannot be ignored. The recent viral BBC video featuring an eyewitness account of an assassination attempt on Donald Trump sheds light on the challenges faced by journalists in verifying information and maintaining credibility in the midst of sensational news stories.

The viral nature of the BBC video brought widespread attention to the eyewitness’ account, leading to questions about the reliability of his claims and the credibility of the journalist who conducted the interview. As the video gained momentum online, viewers were captivated by the dramatic retelling of events and the seemingly unbelievable nature of the story.

However, behind the sensationalism lies a crucial question about the responsibility of journalists in reporting breaking news. While the eyewitness in the BBC video may have appeared to be a compelling character, it is essential for journalists to approach such accounts with caution and skepticism. In the rush to capture viral moments, journalists must prioritize verification and fact-checking to ensure the accuracy of the information presented to the public.

The popularity of the viral BBC video highlights the need for media organizations to uphold ethical standards in reporting sensational news stories. With the rise of citizen journalism and social media influencers, traditional news outlets must navigate a landscape flooded with unverified information and sensational claims. By maintaining a commitment to journalistic integrity and ethical reporting practices, journalists can uphold the credibility of the profession in the digital age.

As viewers continue to consume news through online platforms and social media channels, the impact of viral stories on journalism ethics will remain a critical issue. By critically evaluating viral content and holding journalists accountable for accurate reporting, audiences can contribute to a more informed and trustworthy media landscape. The viral BBC video serves as a reminder of the importance of ethical journalism practices in an era dominated by sensationalism and clickbait headlines.