The impact of the online campaign for the return of Easter Island statue by British Museum

The British Museum is facing online calls from social media users in Chile demanding the return of a stone monument taken from Easter Island. This campaign was initiated by a Chilean social media influencer who encouraged his followers to flood the museum’s Instagram posts with comments demanding the return of the moai statue. This online movement has gained momentum and has sparked a larger conversation about the repatriation of cultural artifacts and the ethics of keeping such items in museums around the world.

The statue in question, known as Hoa Hakananai’a, was taken from Rapa Nui in 1868 and has been a point of contention for many years. The islanders have been advocating for the return of their cultural heritage, which they believe rightfully belongs to them. The British Museum defended its position, stating that it has good relations with the Rapa Nui community and that there have been several visits from the islanders to London. However, the pressure from the online campaign and the support it has garnered from Chilean President Gabriel Boric have put the museum in a difficult position.

This incident is not isolated, as it comes at a time when there is a growing global movement for the repatriation of cultural artifacts to their countries of origin. The issue of colonialism, exploitation, and the ethics of keeping such items in Western museums are being questioned more than ever. The British Museum’s decision on how to respond to this campaign will set a precedent for how other institutions deal with similar demands in the future. It will also have wider implications for the relationship between museums, source communities, and the public perception of cultural heritage.

As society becomes more aware of the historical injustices and exploitation that have led to the acquisition of these artifacts, there is increasing pressure on museums to be more transparent and accountable for their collections. The British Museum will need to carefully consider its response and engage in constructive dialogue with the Rapa Nui community to address their concerns and work towards a mutually acceptable solution. Failure to do so could have reputational and ethical consequences that may impact the museum’s standing in the global cultural landscape.