Israel has strongly dismissed a UN resolution calling for a “humanitarian truce” in Gaza, asserting its intention to continue safeguarding its sovereignty and ensure the safety of its citizens. The UN General Assembly, with an overwhelming majority, passed a resolution urging Israel and Hamas to implement an immediate ceasefire. However, Israel’s UN Ambassador, Gilad Erdan, expressed disdain for the UN’s legitimacy and relevance, emphasizing his country’s resolve to combat Hamas by employing all possible means. While the United States voted against the resolution, it has called for a “humanitarian pause” in Israeli military operations.
The conflict, characterized by intensified airstrikes in the Gaza region, escalated following the Hamas attacks on 7th October, resulting in 1,400 casualties in Israel and the abduction of 229 individuals by Hamas. Israel’s military spokesperson, Daniel Hagari, declared the expansion of operations in Gaza, with a focus on targeting underground facilities and terrorist infrastructure. In response, Hagari urged residents of Gaza to relocate further south to ensure their safety.
The UN resolution supported by 120 votes in favor, 14 against, and 45 abstentions not only demanded an immediate truce but also condemned all acts of violence against Israeli and Palestinian civilians, including indiscriminate attacks. Although non-binding, the resolution carries moral weight due to the broad membership of the UN. Ambassador Erdan categorizes the passing of the resolution as a dark day for the UN and humanity, accusing those in favor of supporting Hamas, terrorists reminiscent of Nazis.
US national security spokesperson, John Kirby, expressed support for temporary ceasefires to facilitate the safe evacuation of hostages from Gaza, as well as the delivery of aid. While the White House has not addressed Israel’s decision to expand ground operations, France’s President Emmanuel Macron called for a ceasefire and highlighted the need to protect the civilian population in Gaza amidst Israel’s escalating attacks.
Jordan warned of the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of a ground war, while Israel demanded the resignation of UN Secretary-General António Guterres over his remarks regarding the Gaza conflict. Guterres condemned Hamas’s attacks but also emphasized the contextual factors. Israel’s criticism focused on his alleged justification of terrorism.
While the UN truce resolution is not legally binding, it reflects a global call for peace and underscores the gravity of the situation. As the conflict continues to unfold, it remains essential to closely monitor developments and their potential impact on regional stability and lives in Gaza.
