President Joe Biden’s recent decision to allow a ceasefire resolution to pass through the Security Council, despite Israel’s actions in Gaza, marks a significant shift in US-Israel relations. This move demonstrates that strong words alone are not sufficient to address the ongoing conflict, indicating a growing divide between the White House and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The rift between the two allies deepened as Netanyahu criticized the US for not vetoing the resolution, claiming it hindered Israel’s war efforts and attempts to free hostages held by Hamas. Biden, a self-proclaimed Zionist, has been a staunch supporter of Israel and has provided unwavering support since the start of the war. However, he expects Israel to conduct its military operations in accordance with international humanitarian law.
The President has urged Israel to protect civilians and avoid excessive use of force, warning against repeating past mistakes driven by anger and retaliation. Despite Israel’s claims of respecting the laws of war, reports from the UN and aid agencies suggest otherwise, with Gaza on the verge of a humanitarian crisis.
The US has responded by delivering aid to Gaza and supporting the ceasefire resolution, signaling a pushback against accusations of enabling Israeli actions. The resolution’s acceptance challenges Israel’s perceived immunity from international pressure and sets a clear expectation for compliance.
Netanyahu, whose coalition relies on ultranationalist extremists’ support, faces a dilemma in adhering to the resolution. Failure to comply may prompt US action, potentially impacting arms supplies crucial for Israel’s military operations. The longstanding US-Israel alliance faces strain as disagreements persist, highlighting the complexity of their relationship.
The current crisis underscores the testing of US diplomacy limits amid escalating tensions and humanitarian concerns in Gaza. As the Biden administration navigates the delicate balance between supporting Israel and advocating for humanitarian principles, the outcome of this conflict will shape future US-Israel relations and international perceptions of American foreign policy.
